BPhO, as a top global high school physics competition, far exceeds standard school curricula in depth and breadth. Students from different international curriculum systems (A-Level, IB, AP) have their own strengths and weaknesses in knowledge coverage, mathematical tools, and thinking skills. This article analyzes the articulation between BPhO and each curriculum by system, provides targeted ability improvement suggestions, helping you precisely address weaknesses and efficiently sprint for awards.
I. A-Level Students: Broad Knowledge Coverage, but Needs Deepening + Supplementing Math
Strengths:
The A2 stage covers 90%+ of BPhO topics, including electromagnetic induction, AC circuits, simple harmonic motion, laws of thermodynamics, optical interference, etc.
Clear problem logic, emphasizes conceptual understanding, which is close to the style of some BPhO problem types.
Weaknesses:
Calculus is almost never involved: A-Level physics prohibits using calculus to solve problems, while BPhO has many problems requiring derivatives/integrals for modeling.
Primarily focuses on idealized models, lacking training in modeling real-world complex scenarios.
Improvement Suggestions:
Quickly supplement calculus applications and extend beyond the syllabus content.
Train "de-idealization" thinking: When practicing, actively ask: "How would the model change if friction/air resistance/non-linear factors were added?"
II. IB Students: HL Depth is Sufficient, but Needs Strengthened Modeling + Mathematical Tools
Strengths:
IB HL Physics depth > A-Level A2: Covers modern physics like relativity, quantum basics, wave-particle duality, even touching on conceptual precursors to Lagrangian formulations.
Strong in experiments & error analysis: IB IA training makes students more familiar with uncertainty, data fitting, directly corresponding to BPhO Section 1 experimental problems.
Weaknesses:
Calculus is still not a mandatory tool: Although it may be involved in the Option part, it's rarely used in problem-solving.
Weak in extracting information from long problem statements: IB problems usually give conditions directly, while BPhO often describes real-life scenarios in 2 A4 pages, requiring quick abstraction into a physical model.
Improvement Suggestions:
Systematically introduce calculus-based solving: Re-do kinematics and electromagnetism problems from IB using calculus methods (e.g., using integration to find displacement with variable acceleration).
Intensively read long problem statements: Each week, thoroughly analyze 1 BPhO Section 2 past paper problem, practicing summarizing its physical essence in 3 sentences.
III. AP Students: The C Series is a Springboard, but Needs Supplementing Modules + Enhancing Real-World Modeling
Strengths:
AP Physics C (Mechanics + E&M) includes calculus, naturally providing the core mathematical tool for BPhO.
Large calculation volume trains strong algebraic and symbolic manipulation skills.
Weaknesses:
Severe knowledge module gaps:
AP 1&2 lack: Rigid body rotation (beyond basics), second law of thermodynamics, optical diffraction, fluid mechanics.
AP C completely omits: Optics, thermodynamics, modern physics.
Problems are overly standardized: AP problems are mostly "frictionless incline," "ideal spring," lacking BPhO's multi-factor coupled real-world scenarios.
Improvement Suggestions:
Urgently supplement the three major missing modules:
| Module | Core Content | Recommended Resource |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | Double-slit interference, diffraction grating, thin-film interference | Young & Freedman Ch.35–36 |
| Thermodynamics | Entropy change calculation, Carnot cycle efficiency | Khan Academy + BPhO Past Papers |
| Fluid Mechanics | Bernoulli's equation, viscous drag | Feynman Lectures Vol.2 |
Conquer long modeling problems: Focus on practicing BPhO 2018–2024 Section 2, summarizing strategies for deconstructing "multi-process comprehensive problems."
Strategic Note: If you have only studied AP 1&2, it is recommended to first self-study AP C Mechanics (core can be mastered in 1 month), then supplement optics/thermodynamics; otherwise, competitiveness may be insufficient.

